Comments on: Fidelity Mutual Fund & CAMS – SIP Application Rejection http://whatho.satpathy.org/2008/02/15/personal-finance/investing/mutual-funds/fidelity-mutual-fund/fidelity-mutual-fund-cams-sip-application-rejection/ Ah! To live with a What Ho on my lips and a Gentleman's Gentleman... {sigh}... Such is life... Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:58:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: tikit colleter http://whatho.satpathy.org/2008/02/15/personal-finance/investing/mutual-funds/fidelity-mutual-fund/fidelity-mutual-fund-cams-sip-application-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-18 tikit colleter Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:34:09 +0000 http://whatho.satpathy.org/2008/02/15/investing/fidelity-mutual-fund-cams-sip-application-rejection/#comment-18 thank you best regard thank you best regard

]]> By: tikit colleter http://whatho.satpathy.org/2008/02/15/personal-finance/investing/mutual-funds/fidelity-mutual-fund/fidelity-mutual-fund-cams-sip-application-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-19 tikit colleter Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:32:56 +0000 http://whatho.satpathy.org/2008/02/15/investing/fidelity-mutual-fund-cams-sip-application-rejection/#comment-19 thankyou your comment but urgent jobs thankyou your comment but urgent jobs

]]> By: What Ho! » Blog Archive » Clerical Error - CAMS Has Done It Again! http://whatho.satpathy.org/2008/02/15/personal-finance/investing/mutual-funds/fidelity-mutual-fund/fidelity-mutual-fund-cams-sip-application-rejection/comment-page-1/#comment-17 What Ho! » Blog Archive » Clerical Error - CAMS Has Done It Again! Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:10:29 +0000 http://whatho.satpathy.org/2008/02/15/investing/fidelity-mutual-fund-cams-sip-application-rejection/#comment-17 [...] The time before that they made a mistake in my address. C51 became C55. And the time before that they rejected a SIP application because the cheque was postdated even though the process specifically stated that postdated cheques [...]

[...] The time before that they made a mistake in my address. C51 became C55. And the time before that they rejected a SIP application because the cheque was postdated even though the process specifically stated that postdated cheques [...]

]]>